{ "numMessagesInTopic": 36, "nextInTime": 1019, "senderId": "7FudcTIsniaEOdP9CvUIgF612wKHfKkuLFEJix9vaS7PbnynY-LXhSvTuuNQvdZhrYiJRfkO2uRQoTu-MZOBD2jQY8byx2IZroPtE8M_gakq", "systemMessage": false, "subject": "Re: [01v96] Alesis HD24 vs Fostex D2424LV", "from": ""Peter Knight" <afterhours@...>", "authorName": "Peter Knight", "msgSnippet": "... time to wash your asshole ... US. ha ha ha :O) ... real time listen to any ... went ok, so transferring in ... device that you are ... it s an advantage to", "msgId": 1018, "profile": "golfboy22au", "topicId": 1001, "spamInfo": { "reason": "0", "isSpam": false }, "replyTo": "LIST", "userId": 126359730, "messageBody": "
>time to wash your asshole
\n> Weird, I didn't get Wiz's post, just an answer to his on this one. Must be
\n
> again, Wiz, your mail isn't making it all the way to the other side of theUS. ha ha ha :O)
\n
>real time listen to any
\n> Check for data errors, Toad. What Peter means is, you are going to have to
\n
> faster than real time data transfer after it's through, to make sure itwent ok, so transferring in
\n
> real time is actually faster, because you are checking the output of thedevice that you are
\n
> transferring to. I mix on the way to the DAW and on the way back, so to meit's an advantage to
\n
> doing real time, it's audible man. :O) If you transfer 24 tracks in realtime and it's a 5 minute
\n
> song, it only takes 5 minutes. You can't work on the songs withoutlistening to them, kill two birds
\n
> with one stone. I really don't want to influence your decision on whichHD-R to buy, all 4 are good
\n
> and stable enough for live recording.Ronny
\n>
\n> Keep On Trackin'
\n>
\n> Ronny Morris - Digitak Mastering
\n> http://208.191.230.169/wbbs/Digitak/index.php
\n
\n
\n