{ "numMessagesInTopic": 22, "nextInTime": 1146, "senderId": "SNt_HIk-rRJKgQYRPoKa3nomxGhRawiFCnevIMb13INtHTZZVNau2Kf0nqTTv94eJSHZT3lPfuSBbd4hD6BTnzHG1XgkTtqo3Zaorqv26GmX", "systemMessage": false, "subject": "Re: [01v96] Two sets of monitors...", "from": ""Ronny Morris" <digitakmastering@...>", "authorName": "Ronny Morris", "msgSnippet": "... When I was talking gain matching, I m talking A/B ing the two mixes after they are mixed to stereo, on what ever mix down device, not A/Bing the whole mix", "msgId": 1145, "profile": "ronnymorris2001", "topicId": 1136, "spamInfo": { "reason": "0", "isSpam": false }, "replyTo": "LIST", "userId": 136810499, "messageBody": "
>When I was talking gain matching, I'm talking A/B'ing the two mixes after they are mixed to stereo,
\n> Ronny, I don't think that is necessary. If he were comparing monitors,yes,
\n> but to hear what a mix sounds like on different monitors, no. Level matching
\n> is not important. Only to the extent that the source is equal, ie. a cd
\n> track. As a matter of fact I would listen to the mix throughout a gain range
\n> on each set. To see(hear) if they sound good at low volume, mid-vol. and
\n> higher volumes. Each set. This is pretty consistent with your further
\n> comments about the boom boxes. They are not going to be gain matched but are
\n> going to be very good indicators of how good the mix is going to translate
\n> in the real world.
\n>
\n
\n