{ "numMessagesInTopic": 25, "nextInTime": 1215, "senderId": "XjayylFaodZ39mLCpfKz4orz0E2xNy8DtWHT9jyGSJECTnfkyUqH9N4q50ihMEGNNTfOBp_xlw2Dpeg5kTc0Xp2s0xZB2pFMfNE", "systemMessage": false, "subject": "RE: [01v96] Word clock/synch", "from": ""Todd Wilcox" <twilcox@...>", "authorName": "Todd Wilcox", "msgSnippet": "... Ok, I think that s the big piece of information I was missing. I guess I was right in thinking that I m not in a situation where I really NEED to use ", "msgId": 1214, "profile": "goobernumber9", "topicId": 1191, "spamInfo": { "reason": "0", "isSpam": false }, "replyTo": "LIST", "userId": 53486837, "messageBody": "
> received by it. BNC WC will carry farther and not be affectedOk, I think that's the big piece of information I was missing. I guess I was
\n> by an audio
\n> wordclock carrier. As Flo mentioned, you lose clock integrity
\n> when chaining
\n> wordclock between audio devices, with the more devices you
\n> add. A dedicated
\n> wordclock like an Aardsync II, has several BNC outs and can
\n> master to many
\n> devices. All devices clock from the Aardsync hub and are not
\n> chained, this
\n> is called a star config and is more stable than stacking digi
\n> devices and
\n> chaning wordclock over audio carrier or even BNC. Also some
\n
\n
> This doesn't have so much to do with your ADAT 9 pin, whichYes, that's what I though the DB-9 connectors were called.
\n> is probably what
\n> you are calling ADAT synch. In ADAT asynchronous, wordclock
\n
\n
> You aren't using midi, there should be no sync problems asTrue, unless you count running the Alesis using MMC from the V96. That also
\n> mentioned by a
\n> previous poster. If or when you get to syncing devices via
\n
\n
> > Can anyone explain when I would choose to use Word Clock orBy "in-band" I meant "interleaved with the audio data". I just stole that
\n> ADAT Synch
\n> > interfaces over simply synching in-band?
\n> >
\n
\n> Not sure what you mean by syncing in-band, do you mean v96
\n> internal word
\n> clock? Remember optimum master clock comes from the source of
\n
\n> Second question. The BNC is more stable and goes farther as it is a
\n> dedicated clock signal not interleaved with the audio data.
\n
\n