{ "numMessagesInTopic": 15, "nextInTime": 127, "senderId": "BzKTi9yfFxiz9YmEQrtDxpAHF0dWvvs3OGfntoBgIt-WEHNKQJFEBJDFCguRf0PX3zLmUikBRcbFZov71EyiZ9eY-M8f6q1_BY0S15iF0E5SQPGpzslX9SkeBDAhgeN5", "systemMessage": false, "subject": "Re: New 01v96 vs Tascam DM-24", "from": ""ronnymorris2001 <romo1@...>" <romo1@...>", "authorName": "ronnymorris2001 <romo1@thebest.net>", "msgSnippet": "... Tascam ... lot of ... against the ... The pre-amps on the DM24 are low gain and they use the same non linear potentiometers as the AW4416, no ribbons", "msgId": 126, "profile": "ronnymorris2001", "topicId": 115, "spamInfo": { "reason": "0", "isSpam": false }, "replyTo": "LIST", "userId": 73943631, "messageBody": "
> >From: "Rob Hudson" <robhudson@c...>Tascam
\n> >Reply-To: 01v96@yahoogroups.com
\n> >To: <01v96@yahoogroups.com>
\n> >Subject: [01v96] New 01v96 vs Tascam DM-24
\n> >Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 21:33:25 -0500
\n> >
\n> >The subject says it all. How do you think the new 01v96 and the
\n
> >DM24 compare to each other? I know the DM24 has more inputs and alot of
\n
> >standard outputs but how do the preamps and effects stack upagainst the
\n
> >01v96?The pre-amps on the DM24 are low gain and they use the same non
\n> >----------------------------------
\n> >Rob Hudson
\n>
\n
\n
> Rob,s=9ede12c7e0c4162cb5cb1014159b5c9e&threadid=25740
\n>
\n> This link:
\n> http://www.tascam.com/forums/showthread.php?
\n
> , if it works, is to a comparison of the two boards made by aTascam
\n
> employee at the Digital Board Forum at Tascam.com.have a DM24
\n>
\n> My partner and I have had 3 1st gen 01vs and even a ProMix. We
\n
> and one 01v left. I can make some observations here.are
\n>
\n> There has been a problem concerning the gain that you get when you
\n
> getting preamp levels with the DM24. We did a great acousticguitar session
\n
> with 2 AKG 535 mics in A/B position. The mic, as an aside is asleeper!
\n
> For $500 for two, it does a great job of alot of things. Anyway, Ihad to
\n
> turn the pre-amp on the Tascam more than 80%+ the way up to get adecent
\n
> signal. And, it is probably noisier at that stage too. There wasa mass
\n
> complaint about this problem, and Tascam, to their credit, provideda fix
\n
> (that you'd pay for), for owners that it annoys.What the deal is Jim, is that the stock pre pots only have 40% gain
\n
\n
\n
> mind that much. The pres sound very good at 24/44 into the AlesisHD24 thru
\n
> a Motu 2408...as I
\n>
\n> The TC Reverbs in the Tascam, which I have not played with enough,
\n
> spend most of the time mastering, not recording, are quiteconvincing. I
\n
> can say that they seem better than the current V, but I am a suckerfor TC
\n
> Verbs. I am sure that the TC verb in the Tascam is probably amiddle line
\n
> algo for the company, but it is a sound I like.important to
\n>
\n> The Tascam has a wider footprint compared to the V. That is
\n
> some, but it 'aint fittin' in no rack!cap., as
\n>
\n> My partner is moderately interested in the Yammy 1000 for surround
\n
> we tend to keep boards less that a year or so each, so who knowswhat I have
\n
> to compare it to next!2408mkII.
\n>
\n> As far as inputs, yes we have 24 ADAT in and out (3 cards) to the
\n
>sonics.
\n> As soon as I hear the 01v96, I can give a fair comparison on the
\n
> I'd say, if it fits your needs as far as in and outs, you could bevery
\n
> happy with the new V. Some of us will probably order one withouteven
\n
> hearing it first.That will be me, judging entirely on the past performance of the
\n
\n
>
\n> Jim
\n>
\n>
\n> Jim DeSalvo
\n> Beanstudio Mastering
\n> West Orange, NJ 07052
\n>
\n> e: jim@b...
\n> http://www.beanstudio.com
\n>
\n> _________________________________________________________________
\n> STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
\n> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail