{ "numMessagesInTopic": 4, "nextInTime": 1537, "senderId": "Q4N6R3WoDOBgIQr7IGtqfu_nytNWZ9FnQ8qFJ8HjKmSfpiILfB3itRvrvz7xUWohnUsK4Uq5_nwBottq", "systemMessage": false, "subject": "Re: [rigtips] Re: dbx AFS 224 anyone?", "from": "<twilcox@...>", "authorName": "twilcox@patriot.net", "msgSnippet": "... I think that s a GREAT idea. Sadly, I m sorta (foolishly?) setting myself up as a provider, meaning I don t know what band I will be mixing next with this ", "msgId": 1536, "profile": "goobernumber9", "topicId": 1536, "spamInfo": { "reason": "0", "isSpam": false }, "replyTo": "LIST", "userId": 53486837, "messageBody": "
> Hey Todd,I think that's a GREAT idea. Sadly, I'm sorta (foolishly?) setting myself up
\n>
\n> what about applying the $300 for the dbx toward IEMs? Although they
\n> may seem a little pricey, as long as you get decent ones, the problems
\n> they solve make them well worth it (IMHO). no wedges to haul around,
\n> no feedback problems, (depending on your setup) personal mixes for
\n> each band member, solid monitor mixes night after night. They help
\n> keep stage levels down and reduce/eliminate bleed, which will in turn,
\n> improve FOH mix. just my two cents...
\n
\n