{ "numMessagesInTopic": 15, "nextInTime": 1585, "senderId": "jiLu0LhYlIPDPdPAlhjNKceaUt72m-ZnQNKlxTexUQnUwp6dqBNM12NlJnhhtIBK8glVZZ1AIxQ3Ztg538OM_7sW", "systemMessage": false, "subject": "Re: Two 01V96s or one DM1000?", "from": ""Byron" <bysbox1@...>", "authorName": "Byron", "msgSnippet": "Two 01v96 s actually cost less (by about $2000) and will give you 80 inputs as opposed to 48 inputs from the DM1000. Also the DM1000 was made for broadcast", "msgId": 1584, "profile": "bysbox1", "topicId": 1559, "spamInfo": { "reason": "0", "isSpam": false }, "replyTo": "LIST", "userId": 85832580, "messageBody": "
--- In 01v96@yahoogroups.com, "Rob Hudson" <robhudson@c...> wrote:
\n> Doug,
\n> Did you think about a 02r96?
\n> ----- Original Message -----
\n> From: "Douglas Carmichael" <dcarmich@m...>
\n> To: <01v96@yahoogroups.com>
\n> Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2004 12:52 PM
\n> Subject: [01v96] Two 01V96s or one DM1000?
\n>
\n>
\n> > I'm trying to decide between an 01V96 or a DM1k for my
\nforthcoming small
\n> > studio setup, and I'm really thinking about which would be best...
\n> >
\n> > An 01V96 with an MY16-AT card could accommodate the 24 tracks
\nfrom my Mac
\n> > (a RME Hammerfall DSP Digiface), but I also plan on getting an
\nSGI Octane
\n> > in the 'far-future' which would take 2 more ADAT I/Os.
\n> >
\n> > I couldn't cascade the two 01V96s (all the ADAT ports on the
\nfirst would
\n> be
\n> > taken), but I could see taking the S/PDIF of 01v96 #1 into the
\nS/PDIF in
\n> > of 01v96 #2.
\n> >
\n> > Would an 01V96 'hold me over' or would you recommend biting the
\nbullet
\n> > for the DM1K+meterbridge?
\n> >
\n> > (Will the DM1k V2 upgrade be freely downloadable like 01V96 v2?)
\n> >
\n> > Thanks.
\n> >
\n> > --Douglas
\n> >
\n> >
\n> >
\n> >
\n> > Yahoo! Groups Links
\n> >
\n> >
\n> >
\n> >
\n> >