{ "numMessagesInTopic": 7, "nextInTime": 1988, "senderId": "SVu-po5MtFAVy4Ry3SWfSwDUxDS78mIMhd_gB63gsMO3h3_U3nV7lY7P4rdE6zJGFNs8IHFe39wW_Pw9bviZb2blGHs", "systemMessage": false, "subject": "Re: SMAARTing the V", "from": ""Carol" <frankwa@...>", "authorName": "Carol", "msgSnippet": "... set ... should ... Tom Hear is how to look at it. You will be coming out of your cd players ( I would recommend pink noise )right channel and putting a Y", "msgId": 1987, "profile": "petpeavey", "topicId": 1982, "spamInfo": { "reason": "0", "isSpam": false }, "replyTo": "LIST", "userId": 8787581, "messageBody": "
> --- In 01v96@yahoogroups.com, "Carol" <frankwa@p...> wrote:set
\n> >
\n> > > Tom
\n> >
\n> > Here you go.
\n> > Doug
\n> >
\n> > http://www.siasoft.com/pdf/Getting-Started-SmaartLive.pdf
\n> >
\n> > Hope it loads right.....
\n>
\n> Doug,
\n>
\n> Yup, been studying that one. I used SMAART about 2 years ago to
\n
> my mains up, but haven't used it since. I'll be rusty, but Ishould
\n
> be ok.Tom
\n>
\n> The thing that has my brain hurting is how to hook it up so that I
\n> don't get an inaccurate time reading. With the different latencies
\n> that you found when testing for me, I want to keep everything
\n> baselined.
\n>
\n> So, I think this is what I will do:
\n>
\n> 1. CD into Ch 15 (center pan)
\n> 2. Feed mains with 1 main out
\n> 3. Feed subs with aux 8 through omni 4
\n>
\n> That is my standard show setup.
\n>
\n> 4. Feed SMAART with ch 15 through aux 7 with all dynamics and eq
\n> off/flat. That is a known path and results in 1.2 ms latency which
\n> will match the minimum that everything else is seeing.
\n>
\n> This should allow me to use full dynamics and eq on the mains and
\n> subs and still determine relative time alignment accurately.
\n>
\n> Good, bad or ugly?
\n
\n
\n
\n