{ "numMessagesInTopic": 14, "nextInTime": 639, "senderId": "HST945HoxQ1Y4YNDgDgAF57I8FT-hcA7zwJFiHzcPli0U997WJe4NxDKWm71rvD9VZzb3UOVVc9uZovZk1cEKhzS44SwCetuoROlYOI", "systemMessage": false, "subject": "Re: O1v96 latency", "from": ""smartloops" <frankbasile@...>", "authorName": "smartloops", "msgSnippet": "Hi Ronnie, ... the mixer and back, I thought the software would compensate for any latency, no? This would also imply that when recording from an external", "msgId": 638, "profile": "smartloops", "topicId": 630, "spamInfo": { "reason": "0", "isSpam": false }, "replyTo": "LIST", "userId": 161761075, "messageBody": "
> Your only solution as youthe mixer and back,
\n> are going to get some latency with any card going round trip to
\n
> than re-align the newYes, that's what I'll probably have to do.
\n> tracks on the timeline with the non v96 effected tracks, by moving
\n> them upward 1020 samples.
\n
\n
> Any particular reasons why you would rather use the mouseI'm not mixing the song. I'm leaving the drum tracks in multi-track
\n>than the real faders on the v96?
\n
\n