{ "numMessagesInTopic": 14, "nextInTime": 990, "senderId": "RjMr2n3OFRWEWic_QP_yBE2GMflqcLff6muxmsU1_ES5jOEJnAXS8Mm0Ei8oBKOTAkDqF4ZA9GnnIyur6jJvujO3Tufkmlr21g", "systemMessage": false, "subject": "RE: [01v96] Re: Low cut filter smaart follow up", "from": ""Dean Brown" <dean@...>", "authorName": "Dean Brown", "msgSnippet": "... Ronny, This brings up a question that I have been having for about a week or so. I am trying to adjust my listening environment and in the process thought", "msgId": 989, "profile": "dstdean", "topicId": 986, "spamInfo": { "reason": "0", "isSpam": false }, "replyTo": "LIST", "userId": 108906315, "messageBody": "
> -----Original Message-----Ronny,
\n> From: Ronny Morris [mailto:digitakmastering@...]
\n> Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2003 8:58 AM
\n> To: 01v96@yahoogroups.com
\n> Subject: Re: [01v96] Re: Low cut filter smaart follow up
\n>
\n>
\n> Pink noise is too erratic, try using a sine tone and the
\n> Smaart readings should be more accurate. To create pink
\n> noise, white noise passes through a "-3dB per octave drop
\n> filter". It's best for audible evaluations as it mirrors
\n> human acuity, but not best for mechanical calculation.
\n>
\n>
\n> Keep On Trackin'
\n>
\n> Ronny Morris - Digitak Mastering
\n
\n