{ "numMessagesInTopic": 19, "nextInTime": 1309, "senderId": "--fq28YctuOYX2gvAR6dyMnftoK8F62TvY6ugENDh3FgDVpi1GYm8AIKAuz64g77Oy5OaAh-Nd02hw5V4jG9jCKccdY", "systemMessage": false, "subject": "Re: [GE-Mpa] Aegis on ham bands?", "from": "Gary Peterson <NZ5V@...>", "authorName": "Gary Peterson", "msgSnippet": "Nate; From Riley Holligsworth on 5/2/2007: Hi. This is ARRL s take on it and we agree. ... From: Henderson, Dan N1ND [mailto:dhenderson@arrl.org] Sent:", "msgId": 1308, "profile": "gs79602", "topicId": 1302, "spamInfo": { "reason": "12", "isSpam": false }, "replyTo": "LIST", "userId": 157218573, "messageBody": "
\n\n\n \n\n \nNate;
\n
\nFrom Riley Holligsworth on 5/2/2007:
\n
\n Hi. This is ARRL's take on it and we agree.
\n
\n
\n*** Non-Public: For Internal Use Only ***
\n-----Original Message-----
\nFrom: Henderson, Dan N1ND [mailto:dhenderson@...]
\nSent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 2:20 PM
\nTo: Riley Hollingsworth
\nSubject: RE: AEGIS Digital Voice use on Amateur Frequencies?
\n
\nYeppers... Of course...
\n
\n
\nDan Henderson, N1ND
\nRegulatory Information Specialist
\nARRL - The national association for Amateur Radio
\n860-594-0236
\ndhenderson@...
\n
\n
\n 
\n
\n-----Original Message-----
\nFrom: Riley Hollingsworth [mailto:Riley.Hollingsworth@...]
\nSent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 1:52 PM
\nTo: Henderson, Dan N1ND
\nSubject: RE: AEGIS Digital Voice use on Amateur Frequencies?
\n
\nMai I send him your take on it?
\n
\n
\n*** Non-Public: For Internal Use Only *** -----Original Message-----
\nFrom: Henderson, Dan N1ND [mailto:dhenderson@...]
\nSent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 2:24 PM
\nTo: Riley Hollingsworth
\nSubject: RE: AEGIS Digital Voice use on Amateur Frequencies?
\n
\nWell, we don't have AEGIS specs listed as an open protocol of approved
\ndigital modes on
\n
\nhttp://www.arrl.org/FandES/field/regulations/techchar/
\n
\nI would probably think that the protocol specs aren't "public" so
\nrunning I would be illegal encryption. And without the commercial
\nlicense, they aren't legal there.
\n
\nMaybe a discrete simplex common frequency for those doing the DFing
\nwould be the best option?
\n
\n
\nDan Henderson, N1ND
\nRegulatory Information Specialist
\nARRL - The national association for Amateur Radio
\n860-594-0236
\ndhenderson@...
\n
\n************************************************
\nGary
\nNZ5V
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\nNate Duehr wrote:\n
\n
\n

Gary Peterson wrote:
\n> First, the opinion of the ARRL digital formats tech guy and a
\n> concurrence from Riley Hollingsworth was that APCO25 isn't legal\non the
\n> ham band. There is a lot of disagreement here, and personally, I\nthink
\n> that in the end, APCO25 will likely become an accepted digital\nformat on
\n> the ham bands.
\n
\nDo you have a reference for this that's published somewhere? I'd like
\nto see it, because I'd like to send them comments on it. P-25 is as
\nmuch a fully published protocol as say, D-Star. (Unlike some standards
\nthe FCC is allowing -- say, like PACTOR III...)
\n
\n> Second, AEGIS is a proprietary protocall and although there are\nsome who
\n> think otherwise, the only AEGIS machines I know of are on\ncommercial
\n> freq's. Unless we can get M/A Com to release the spec's on AEGIS\nnow
\n> that it's pretty much a dead product, it can't be used on the Ham\nband.
\n
\nOr someone fully reverse-engineers it and publishes their findings. :-)
\n
\nNate WY0X
\n

\n
\n\n
\n \n
\n
", "prevInTime": 1307, "specialLinks": [], "contentTrasformed": false, "postDate": "1200011250", "canDelete": false, "nextInTopic": 1309, "prevInTopic": 1307, "headers": { "inReplyToHeader": "PDQ3ODZCNTAzLjEwNjA3QG5hdGV0ZWNoLmNvbT4=", "messageIdInHeader": "PDQ3ODZCN0YyLjcwOTA3MDFAYXJybC5uZXQ+", "referencesHeader": "PGZtNTkwYytrcWQyQGVHcm91cHMuY29tPiA8NDc4NjJGMjIuNTA3MDcwNUBhcnJsLm5ldD4gPDQ3ODZCNTAzLjEwNjA3QG5hdGV0ZWNoLmNvbT4=" } }