{ "numMessagesInTopic": 19, "nextInTime": 1068, "senderId": "h-TOVYWuzVniyKKtyLKYCM_iaSaKiG5l66L4P9pBxxf3rBXh0f0xqEp2yQ1N7WaSWitVY3YRdeAb0_eCfifE0slY66aSgTj63EiGy91xEA", "systemMessage": false, "subject": "Re: Quad SLI announced in a DELL box at CES", "from": ""fluppeteer" <yahoo@...>", "authorName": "fluppeteer", "msgSnippet": "... (Equally the consumer dual link cards, now 7800s can do it.) ... Many pixels for strategy games - not that I have the time. 3DMark05 is very pretty at full", "msgId": 1067, "profile": "fluppeteer", "topicId": 1052, "spamInfo": { "reason": "12", "isSpam": false }, "replyTo": "LIST", "userId": 192443393, "messageBody": "
>(Equally the consumer dual link cards, now 7800s can do it.)
\n> FX3400's seem to be pretty cheap with SLI, while not perfect, they
\n> are a heck of a lot less than the HR256.
\n
\n
> Besides, the reaction timeMany pixels for strategy games - not that I have the time.
\n> of the monitor is so great, that the refresh rate shouldn't really
\n> come into play when using it for games (why anyway?????)
\n
\n
> JustDon't forget to add some Quadro FX600s (two T221s off each)
\n> imagine the new maximum amound of monitors though... 8... all going
\n> at 12.5Hz. A 73.6 MP desktop size, 30720 x 19200 Drool.....
\n
\n
> LMAO @ T220, wasn't its refresh 4Hz or something rediculously slowThe one I saw (at SIGGRAPH01), which I *think* equated to a T220
\n> like that, not to mention being $15,000+?
\n
\n