{ "numMessagesInTopic": 10, "nextInTime": 1176, "senderId": "KwSSY4m9jkuwNwkdwTIzuKrWvutbwirTFf2hLTZ7zJi-VK9gZiK1aKKtKZJxAxRPgivv6_1YzBkiRYrhDhXFkGga", "systemMessage": false, "subject": "RE: [IBM_T2X_LCD] T221 advocacy", "from": ""tecsi" <tecsi@...>", "authorName": "tecsi", "msgSnippet": "Article is good BUT, imho, a 30 display is too larger for computer work, because the head, rather than just the eyes needs to move to view the corners of the", "msgId": 1175, "profile": "tecsi12", "topicId": 1171, "spamInfo": { "reason": "12", "isSpam": false }, "replyTo": "LIST", "userId": 241781349, "messageBody": "
Article is\ngood BUT, imho, a 30” display is too larger for computer work, because the\nhead, rather than just the eyes needs to move to view the corners of the\nscreen.
\n\n\n\n
It seems like\n24” is about the max size for normal use where the eyes can track\ncomfortably without a lot of head movement.
\n\n\n\n
Does anyone\nhave the ergonomic specifics of this issue (size and head movement?)
\n\n\n\n
Barry Smith
\n\n\n\n
From:\nIBM_T2X_LCD@yahoogroups.com [mailto:IBM_T2X_LCD@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of fluppeteer
\nSent: Monday, February 13, 2006\n8:23 AM
\nTo: IBM_T2X_LCD@yahoogroups.com
\nSubject: [IBM_T2X_LCD] T221\nadvocacy
\n\n
Interesting article in The\nInquirer, preaching that QUXGA-W
\nis the future:
\n
\nhttp://www.theinquirer.net/?article=29655
\n
\nNow if enough journalists took this viewpoint,\nrather than
\nclaiming that 1600x1200 on a laptop was too much\nbecause "the
\npixels are too small", there might be more of\nthese monitors
\nabout...
\n
\nI have to agree that the fact that 1080\nresolutions don't
\nfit properly on the Apple/Dell 30" displays\nis putting me
\noff getting one, a bit. (But then my shower's just\nmelted
\ninto a smelly glob of molten plastic, and\nreplacing that
\nprobably takes priority over such purchases!)
\n
\n--
\nFluppeteer
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n