{ "numMessagesInTopic": 5, "nextInTime": 1491, "senderId": "v8dM2rF16OIKroQbaq-Ev8p-L2K98Q0E9WTjylu7DL6i59JgXoMrJ-P24wsfviN3fF_b4IKfWIv32cHcahr8MABTTvLRGGKcc3k-nVMjWw", "systemMessage": false, "subject": "Re: 3-stripe mode working with home-made converter box!", "from": ""fluppeteer" <yahoo@...>", "authorName": "fluppeteer", "msgSnippet": "... If that s possible, it would be most helpful. Especially if my theory that spanning mode in consumer drivers might be happier with two identical heads", "msgId": 1490, "profile": "fluppeteer", "topicId": 1481, "spamInfo": { "reason": "12", "isSpam": false }, "replyTo": "LIST", "userId": 192443393, "messageBody": "
>If that's possible, it would be most helpful. Especially if my
\n> If the only requirement is maintaining impedance when splitting
\n> the clock signal, then perhaps I could design a small circuit
\n> that would be just moderately difficult for any hobbyist to
\n> build with parts available from Digi-Key.
\n
\n
> On another topic, several posts comment on 225MB/S DVI drivers.Yup - sorry, I should have made it clear whenever I mentioned
\n> This ignores the bandwidth on the T221 DVI receivers. You can't
\n> put a square peg into a round hole of the same width without
\n> losing data.
\n
\n
> Does anybody know what is the manufacturer and part numberNot having taken the back off mine, could I add to that an
\n> for the T221 DVI receiver?
\n
\n