{ "numMessagesInTopic": 23, "nextInTime": 1816, "senderId": "C9DRN5AJzl4EEpy0RDG_sZdZgI0FLv4AS8JZfuyu5iMbbRdh9lsWTiohhrxVGNUZ-GsU52WRdYFAxWaVRR8BUue0esQTgsh9HJwhpjRj", "systemMessage": false, "subject": "Re: Future (Affordable) QWUXGA Displays", "from": ""sosantoso" <sabrina123abc@...>", "authorName": "sosantoso", "msgSnippet": "Put another way, if we want an affordable WQUXGA in a 30 size for let s say $2k (I think this was the figure Fluppeter discussed in another thread), how", "msgId": 1815, "profile": "sosantoso", "topicId": 1688, "spamInfo": { "reason": "6", "isSpam": false }, "replyTo": "LIST", "userId": 45349824, "messageBody": "
--- In IBM_T2X_LCD@yahoogroups.com, "FreddyVV" <freddyvv@...> wrote:
\n>
\n> > > What do you guys think?
\n> >
\n> > Well, you say that... Apart from the obvious problems of the
\n> > gap between the panels, it's not trivial to drive these.
\n> > Every now and then, someone on-line does a group buy for a
\n> > driver board (they're quite popular to put on over-head
\n> > projectors to make cheap 1080p HDTVs). In small quantities,
\n> > they're not the bargain you might think (for the hassle), and
\n> > VP2290bs seem to be quite cheap on eBay these days (relatively),
\n> > so long as MD hasn't bought them all. If they were still
\n> > $7999, it would be more worth it.
\n> >
\n> > On the other hand, people have been saying that the 30"
\n> > screens would have been nicer if they'd been QWUXGA. :-)
\n> > I think I prefer mine being 22", but I suppose the problems
\n> > of fitting a 30" screen on a desk are easier when you can
\n> > bend it in the middle!
\n> >
\n> > That said, if you're setting up a group buy for the driver
\n> > boards, you might tempt me into a single screen for my
\n> > desktop at work...
\n> >
\n> > --
\n> > Fluppeteer
\n>
\n> Hi Fluppeteer, thanks for the welcome =)
\n>
\n> Sorry, that was not what i meant, i was talking about large
\n> Panelmanufacturer, not a selfmade product (ah, my english). If the
\n> 30"-producer (if there is more then one) would just bump the
\n> resolution to 3840*2400 I just can't imagine so much people would
\n> complain (a hasslefree setup has to be provided though).
\n> I can see your problem of plcing such a behemoth on your desktop,
\nI
\n> don't have this complain, because 6 21" Monitor take up a lot more
\n> space.
\n> QWUXGA would be great for Gamer also, because you can use WUXGA
\n> without interpolating and therefore let the power of the GPU let
\n> handle things like effects which add much more beauty to games
\nanyway
\n> these days (I for one don't play much 3D Games, but there are sure
\n> much people).
\n> Well, our discussions probably won't affect the descions of the
\npeople
\n> in charge but dreaming is fun, isn't ist?
\n>
\n> greets
\n> Balzac2m
\n>