{ "numMessagesInTopic": 23, "nextInTime": 1826, "senderId": "0Jvzy2pYdVBYroyLh0sw2grrKLXmAC2kefWiQuWtNFA_PShfkiMc0WxBtHBOox-k8v3q7mEi8AH7JORvcSBtbhWo1KOxL6Qq0kBA9m66", "systemMessage": false, "subject": "Re: Future (Affordable) QWUXGA Displays", "from": ""educationk12" <educationk12@...>", "authorName": "educationk12", "msgSnippet": "Flup, When are these 2160p flat panels projected to be available? That was one reason why I hated the whole Gateway 901 media center/plasma combination because", "msgId": 1825, "profile": "educationk12", "topicId": 1688, "spamInfo": { "reason": "6", "isSpam": false }, "replyTo": "LIST", "userId": 247597564, "messageBody": "
--- In IBM_T2X_LCD@yahoogroups.com, "fluppeteer" <yahoo@...> wrote:
\n>
\n> --- In IBM_T2X_LCD@yahoogroups.com, "FreddyVV" <freddyvv@> wrote:
\n> >
\n> > Yeah, i seems anyway the only displays in production which could be
\n> > referred to as slightly highppi are medical displays.
\n> > Eizo's Radiforce Medical Displays are going as high as 21,3" with
\n> > 2560*2048 at greyscales (which are barely usable as normal monitor)
\n> > and 2048*1536 at colors (I know, it doesn't seem to be much, but this
\n> > seems to be the highest-ppi color display in production.
\n> > R31 (color) cost I think about 6000 Euros alone so it isn't really an
\n> > option and it's specs aren't that impressing either (although i bet
\n> > you won't get any dead pixels ;) )
\n> >
\n> > greets
\n> > B2m
\n>
\n> Since it's current...
\n>
\n> I *would* like one of these (or several) - 7.1" 1080p display.
\n> http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20061017PR207.html
\n>
\n> It's a change from the similarly-sized 1280x768 panel on the
\n> Libretto U105, anyway. (If we're considering serious DPI, you
\n> have to go to things like <2" VGA screens, eInk, and LCoS
\n> non-direct-view screens. Total pixel count isn't up there with
\n> the T221, though.)
\n>
\n> For more pixels, people who want something bigger than the
\n> 30" screens (probably not on this group) might be interested
\n> in CMO's latest 47":
\n> http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20061016PR205.html
\n> (2560x1440 - i.e. 720p x 2x2). Those aware of my feelings about
\n> integer pixel scaling will know why the faith I had in the
\n> manufacturer after their 56" 3840x2160 (720p x 3x3 or 1080p x 2x2)
\n> panel has just been shaken. Allegedly, it *is* being marketed
\n> as a television.
\n>
\n> --
\n> Fluppeteer
\n>