{ "numMessagesInTopic": 10, "nextInTime": 2045, "senderId": "qFRMqSUb6m7onmJrab2sF4u_v2RkUWLE2NsdvDda7ugMrrDmp5Vcbr7wtuDxDd-UafxBJrDt-3zKq8B6f6vmb8aQjsfRCjpbQBPVMIzZ9XCj3lYRbmhLKonD1oXH", "systemMessage": false, "subject": "Re: Happy new owner reporting in... (VP2290b + Dell 30" on Quadro FX 3450)", "from": ""Carlos de la Puente" <delapuente.carlos@...>", "authorName": "Carlos de la Puente", "msgSnippet": "True; not everyone craves as much desktop real estate as they can get. 3840 x 2400 on a T221 takes some getting used-to. And yes, you have to get a bit closer", "msgId": 2044, "profile": "blueyedhusky", "topicId": 2031, "spamInfo": { "reason": "6", "isSpam": false }, "replyTo": "LIST", "userId": 292797075, "messageBody": "
>window/images
\n> Actually, I find it hard to find people who like 204ppi. It seems
\n> everyone I come across in my part of the world likes 80 to 100ppi
\n> screens. Some have poor eye sight; many find the shrunk
\n
> to be frustrating and last but not least the text and the need to bedust.
\n> so close to the monitor. In other words, most people I know don't
\n> share my enthusiasm for such a monitor. :o)
\n>
\n> MD
\n>
\n> --- In IBM_T2X_LCD@yahoogroups.com, "Carlos de la Puente"
\n> <delapuente.carlos@> wrote:
\n> >
\n> > Know the feeling very well; my IBM L201P's are now collecting
\n
> > Anyone experiencing 204ppi would find it very hard to go back to100ppi.
\n
> ><educationk12@>
\n> > --- In IBM_T2X_LCD@yahoogroups.com, "educationk12"
\n
> > wrote:to
\n> > >
\n> >
\n> > > I thought I would like the 100ppi but I found it annoying next
\n
> > > 204ppi.
\n> >
\n>