{ "numMessagesInTopic": 33, "nextInTime": 2313, "senderId": "8FBiJ-o-giFPUaiZJYBRoQGhkYzSbwwn_1gRVBHXH5_WdYCeU3gCQ_Gi0lvKulJY7eb_v14YXOJTCY-S8QWCI4Zffh7HHK_5ufSU5QqQgTcVC1Cjqn2mYix6g1U9", "systemMessage": false, "subject": "Re: Dual Computer with Single Monitor", "from": ""Carlos de la Puente" <delapuente.carlos@...>", "authorName": "Carlos de la Puente", "msgSnippet": "Mark, The only way you get 1920 x 2400, as a single entity, is with the converter box (what was that undocumented EDID? 5?). Otherwise, you need to use two", "msgId": 2312, "profile": "blueyedhusky", "topicId": 2289, "spamInfo": { "reason": "6", "isSpam": false }, "replyTo": "LIST", "userId": 292797075, "messageBody": "
>1920x2400
\n> Carlos,
\n>
\n> If I am using an EDID that is for quad tiles, yet want dual
\n
> screens...wouldn't this be a different EDID setting?would
\n>
\n> MD
\n>
\n> --- In IBM_T2X_LCD@yahoogroups.com, "Carlos de la Puente"
\n> <delapuente.carlos@> wrote:
\n> >
\n> > > I suppose you can do that by setting it up the same way you
\n
> > > a dual-monitor setup.the
\n> >
\n> > I mean to say "a dual-monitor setup in each computer."
\n> >
\n> > I guess you can arrange them in any way you like, but (judging by
\n
> > EDID), it seems it has to be in tiles (not stripes).specification
\n> >
\n> > CP
\n> >
\n> > --- In IBM_T2X_LCD@yahoogroups.com, "Carlos de la Puente"
\n> > <delapuente.carlos@> wrote:
\n> > >
\n> > > MD,
\n> > >
\n> > > Take a look at this ID Tech page
\n> > > http://www.idtech.co.jp/en/920LCD_techinfo/multisystem.html
\n> > >
\n> > > Quoting from that page:
\n> > >
\n> > > "The 9.2 million-pixel, 22.2-inch LCD monitor has four (4) DVI
\n> > input
\n> > > connectors that conform to the VESA digital standard
\n
> > anddesigned
\n> > > can connect up to four (4) computers since this monitor is
\n
> > toinputs
\n> > > work as four (4) independent monitors. When four (4) digital
\n
> > areThen
\n> > > provided, the monitor displays maximum resolution of UXGA wide
\n> > (1920 x
\n> > > 1200 pixels) for each screen corresponding to each input."
\n> > >
\n> > > It states further down that an EDID of 44 or 45 is required.
\n
> > itsystem
\n> > > goes on to say:
\n> > >
\n> > > "In case of old version firmware stored in the monitor (for the
\n> > case of
\n> > > FPGA-logic version 45 or less), you may not use the multi-
\n
> > > function. Even though you update the firmware by using thefirmware
\n
> > > update utility, the old version firmware does not support themulti-
\n
> > > system function."each,
\n> > >
\n> > > This is what I had alluded-to before.
\n> > >
\n> > > They don't talk about connecting two computers at 1920 x 2400
\n
> > butwould a
\n> > > I suppose you can do that by setting it up the same way you
\n
> > dua-(our
\n> > > monitor setup.
\n> > >
\n> > > I don't know why the need to be at a certain FPGA-logic level
\n
> > arewithout
\n> > > version 66), maybe it has to do with the ability to do it
\n
> > the<educationk12@>
\n> > > need to genlock the inputs.
\n> > >
\n> > > CP
\n> > >
\n> > >
\n> > > --- In IBM_T2X_LCD@yahoogroups.com, "educationk12"
\n
> > > wrote:monitor
\n> > > >
\n> > > > Does anybody know if you can connect two computers to one
\n
> > andI
\n> > > > display one computer in 1920x2400 and the other computer in
\n> > 1920x2400
\n> > > > and end up getting 3840x2400 yet with two separate computers.
\n
> > have a24Hz
\n> > > > single-link FX1400 card pushing a monitor at 1920x2400 at
\n
> > (yet it
\n> > > > is in the center of the screen). Any thoughts?
\n> > > >
\n> > > > MD
\n> > > >
\n> > >
\n> >
\n>