{ "numMessagesInTopic": 33, "nextInTime": 2324, "senderId": "kfs3EW4ABsv5ym9Szh-aXEp5KWl3Kyf8V3n1uIAqGuLb6TGBHA1fy2FLyasGY7HuO113IeMFF0k-2SW5roIZ98hcYcP7sk3VEfXNElvN", "systemMessage": false, "subject": "Re: Dual Computer with Single Monitor", "from": ""educationk12" <educationk12@...>", "authorName": "educationk12", "msgSnippet": "I think it would work if I could get the graphics card to recognize 1920x2400 @ 24Hz for single-linke or 48Hz at dual-link as a setting, otherwise I am SOL.", "msgId": 2323, "profile": "educationk12", "topicId": 2289, "spamInfo": { "reason": "6", "isSpam": false }, "replyTo": "LIST", "userId": 247597564, "messageBody": "
>
\n> Steve,
\n>
\n> You're right. You can have do that in twin-input mode with two single
\n> links. But I don't see how that would work if you want to output 1920
\n> x 2400 from one computer and the same from another -- unless you do
\n> it as two outputs of 1920 x 1200 on each computer.
\n>
\n> I suppose it depends on the video card, but none of the ones I have
\n> (mostly nVidia) give me an option to do 1920 x 2400. Having said
\n> that, now I don't think that two converter boxes -- connected to
\n> separate computers -- would work.
\n>
\n> The way I understand it is that you're getting 1920 x 2400 on each
\n> link, but that's because each one is one half of a 3840 x 2400
\n> desktop.
\n>
\n> What Mark wants to have is one desktop of 1920 x 2400, on two
\n> tiles/stripes, using one dual-link port. I don't think that's
\n> possible.
\n>
\n> CP
\n>
\n>
\n> --- In IBM_T2X_LCD@yahoogroups.com, Stephen Wille Padnos
\n> <spadnos@> wrote:
\n> >
\n> > Carlos de la Puente wrote:
\n> >
\n> > >Mark,
\n> > >
\n> > >The only way you get 1920 x 2400, as a single entity, is with the
\n> > >converter box (what was that undocumented EDID? 5?). Otherwise,
\n> you
\n> > >need to use two tiles of 1920 x 1200 each.
\n> > >
\n> > >Maybe I'm missing something here.
\n> > >
\n> > >CP
\n> > >
\n> > >
\n> > I don't think that's correct. I have my VP2290b running in two-tile
\n> mode
\n> > using a Quadro FX 3500. This is from two outputs on one computer,
\n> but
\n> > I'm not sure that matters. The only thing the converter box should
\n> do
\n> > is give you higer refresh rate capability from dual-link DVI.
\n> >
\n> > - Steve
\n> >
\n>