{ "numMessagesInTopic": 8, "nextInTime": 2331, "senderId": "_iayHJEFcCcA9wkSqMwJFjabDjH5Mf5hE8XutC-8d9XUz6DW2LBE3J2NlsdcSUrgez0ReEIwIMd_Ssc8_cNu08kkTKzpgBxdT69zxlSUgeSGOb95BZsUyntr4bqu", "systemMessage": false, "subject": "9503-DGP - There is such a thing (and other trivia)", "from": ""Carlos de la Puente" <delapuente.carlos@...>", "authorName": "Carlos de la Puente", "msgSnippet": "I tought I d start a new subject on this one. Nothing technical here, just a bit of trivia. I was reading what I wrote, and it didn t make much sense. That ", "msgId": 2330, "profile": "blueyedhusky", "topicId": 2284, "spamInfo": { "reason": "6", "isSpam": false }, "replyTo": "LIST", "userId": 292797075, "messageBody": "
>lookup and
\n> > Has anybody heard of a T221-DGP? If you go to warranty info
\n
> > type in 98U4000 and 98U4002 to 98U4016 it states a T221-DGP ratherof
\n> > than DG5. I assume it isn't a custom DG5 but rather a typo.
\n> >
\n>
\n> I just looked at one of the eBay listings Dave mentioned
\n> (190010077583), and the serial number (98U4003) corresponds to one
\n
> those shown as DGP's on IBM's site. The model stated in thatlisting is
\n
> a DG3.
\n>
\n> I guess it must have been -- as you suspect -- a typo.
\n>
\n> CP
\n>