{ "numMessagesInTopic": 4, "nextInTime": 39, "senderId": "0Pzi2D6TjagySvfrgFstlIJsJibwvCLj9EglxKRg2A1jlMgmdmhNLmFp19uJX7aUwp7HRfrRSaHEs9uiHRUJkxZoc0joiaU", "systemMessage": false, "subject": "Re: Howdy", "from": ""sax00axe" <wrightsl@...>", "authorName": "sax00axe", "msgSnippet": "Jim, Time for some quick math here.....the maximum clock for DVI is 165 MHz, and there is one pixel transmitted per clock, so this is 165 Mpixels/sec. For IBM", "msgId": 38, "profile": "sax00axe", "topicId": 31, "spamInfo": { "reason": "0", "isSpam": false }, "replyTo": "LIST", "userId": 144420285, "messageBody": "
--- In IBM_T2X_LCD@yahoogroups.com, Jim Ahn <ahnj@y...> wrote:
\n> Welcome aboard! We welcome your participation.
\n>
\n> As a recent owner of the T210, I'm very interested in locating a
\n> compatible dual-link DVI video card. Due to the limitation of the
\n> single-link DVI port, most T210 owners are driving their monitor
\nover
\n> DVI at a reduced refresh rate. Nvidia drivers specifically contain
\n> built-in DVI support for QXGA at 40hz. But for video display &
\nediting
\n> purposes, 40hz is unacceptable.
\n>
\n> The newest workstation solution from nVidia, Quadro FX 2000, shows
\nsome
\n> promise. This card has two DVI ports - a single-link dvi port and
\n> another dual-link DVI - driven by total of three Silicon Image
\n> transmitters on board. Complete specs are availble here:
\n>
\n> http://www.pny.fr/uk/quadrofx2000.htm
\n>
\n> Another member of this forum reports that although the card syncs at
\n> 60hz, the even/odd pixels not properly aligned. It's unknown if
\nthis
\n> is a monitor issue or video card's. This card has been widely
\n> available on the market since early this year. Any help you can
\n> provide is very appreciated. Thanks.
\n>
\n> Jim
\n>
\n> --- sax00axe <wrightsl@u...> wrote:
\n> > Folks,
\n> >
\n> > I am a member of the research staff at IBM Watson who helped
\ndevelop
\n> > much of the technology which went into IBM T221 9.2 Mpix TFTLCD
\n> > monitor. By chance, I've talked with some of you over the phone
\nand
\n> > become aware of this group.
\n> >
\n> > I can help answer questions, but please understand that I don't
\n> > formally represent IBM. -and I'm sometimes getting as many as
\n100
\n> > business emails per day, and responding can be difficult.
\n> >
\n> > The T221 display represents a huge step forward in image quality-
\n> > however, at the same time it exposes what I call the "wild west
\nof
\n> > computing". -There are many challenges for success, most of them
\n> > having very little to do with the display itself.
\n> >
\n> > I hope I can help reduce confusion and frustration which often
\noccurs
\n> >
\n> > with the introduction of new technology.
\n> >
\n> >