{ "numMessagesInTopic": 5, "nextInTime": 533, "senderId": "7ISl2hlwy5HCMeK6G8TXRILY2hV_kMKnnfH7S_VoHMVnBaVoX0NaEpAg2CpAFerYupZpluuqGjAQ-bNqdnS7xc0sNW_p2KeRzSJfP-4wPg", "systemMessage": false, "subject": "Re: DG3 refresh rate", "from": ""fluppeteer" <yahoo@...>", "authorName": "fluppeteer", "msgSnippet": "... You re welcome - I just hope I wasn t talking nonsense! ... cool ... True (or as fast). How about *four* fx4400s? :-) (More practically, do you need", "msgId": 532, "profile": "fluppeteer", "topicId": 527, "spamInfo": { "reason": "0", "isSpam": false }, "replyTo": "LIST", "userId": 192443393, "messageBody": "
>You're welcome - I just hope I wasn't talking nonsense!
\n> Fluppeteer, thanks for all the suggestions.
\n
\n
> I'm starting to thinkcool
\n> that two more fx600's might be the way to go but it won't be as
\n
> as two fx4400's.True (or as fast). How about *four* fx4400s? :-) (More practically,
\n
\n
> By the way you are right that the fx4400 and a dualusally
\n> 16x pci express board is not yet available but my company can
\n
> get ahold of things early.Hmm. I didn't know anyone was doing an appropriate chipset (ISTR
\n
\n
> Speaking of SLI does anyone know if there3D
\n> are advantages for a multimonitor setup that is not used for any
\n
> applications?I don't know the details of how nVidia do their load balancing -
\n
\n