{ "numMessagesInTopic": 10, "nextInTime": 893, "senderId": "_Y5euTqtXIYMncgN7SNTVyeLo1JF12oslEh3QRW-araMUyvrCcRHOCEyWhLQGMsvvII-AgbU04eujDSRmxcZ7Fnl22IiSmKkc2KztLDnxWxX0VYp", "systemMessage": false, "subject": "Re: [IBM_T2X_LCD] Re: Nvidia 7800GTX", "from": "Wilson John Chan <wilson@...>", "authorName": "Wilson John Chan", "msgSnippet": "It s possible that we both have an early rev of NV40GL. Really a bummer. I tried forcing myself to use 33Hz but after a couple of hours I had to switch back", "msgId": 892, "profile": "wilsoncca", "topicId": 822, "spamInfo": { "reason": "12", "isSpam": false }, "replyTo": "LIST", "userId": 20436897, "messageBody": "
> I've had similar problems with the fx4400. I've also had problems
\n> getting the right settings
\n> to stick on bootup.
\n>
\n> BTW, I heard from someone that apparently a new version of the t221
\n> will be released
\n> around IBC. The new model will have two dual link dvi inputs rather
\n> than needing the
\n> converter box or the breakout cables.
\n>
\n>
\n>
\n>>The QFX4500 press release I saw claimed dual 3840x2400@24Hz. I've been
\n>>wasting a bunch of time with my QFX4000 the past few days. I finally
\n>>got it to do 3840x2400@48Hz (2624x2400+1216x2400), the card would
\n>>frequently lose sync and cause the DG5 to flicker. The loss of sync
\n>>seemed to be heat related but I have no real proof. I hope the
\n>>3400/3450/4400/4500 can do better. The nVidia Forceware release notes
\n>>all claim 3840x2400@48Hz support. Maybe I have a defective card. I
\n>>could do dual view 2624x2400+1216x2400 and 1920x2400+1920x2400
\n>>(w/Forceware 80+) just fine. The loss of sync only affected horizontal
\n>>span mode.
\n>>
\n>>--wilson
\n>>
\n>>