{ "numMessagesInTopic": 7, "nextInTime": 2178, "senderId": "GkpTCSKTDmMC3qgHGGg_Vn6nqasWDJcr7gePs4FadsoQ92AOtegFgkhBYPHQ5m7qrnLMAdQ", "systemMessage": true, "subject": "Re: [Motorola_Software_Users] Re: XTS 5000", "from": "KG4UCC@...", "authorName": "KG4UCC@aol.com", "msgSnippet": "What bandsplit? Is it a I, II, or III? What Options? In a message dated 2/18/2008 9:23:42 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, Gary599@aol.com writes: I have a Moto", "msgId": 2177, "profile": "radioguy4177", "topicId": 2156, "spamInfo": { "reason": "12", "isSpam": false }, "replyTo": "LIST", "userId": 121728280, "messageBody": "
\n\n\n\n\nI have a Moto XTS5000R I'd be willing to trade. I'd be interested in \n
two BCD996T scanners. I'm aware this moto port is priced out at over \n
3,000 dollars to public safety depts. It's easy worth 1,000.
email \n me
Gary599@aol. com
--- In Motorola_Software_ Users@yahoogroup s.com, \n KG4UCC@... wrote:
>
> Yeah, excellent idea. Take your very \n expensive XTS5000 and trade
it for a
> scanner. Scanners are much \n better than the Motorola product! Or
better yet, use
> your XTS5000 \n for 1 or 2 simplex channels and the scanner for
everything
> else. \n What a waste!
> It's not possible to "nuke" your radio over the air. \n They can
turn it
> off, so to speak. If this were to happen your \n radio is not screwed
by any
> means. If you have the software, a \n simple read and re-write and
all is fixed. If
> you don't have the \n software you can buy it for a few hundred bucks
from
> Motorola. \n Get yourself a ribless cable on ebay and you can do it
yourself.
> \n If you still want to go the scanner route as cowpoke71az
states, I will \n
> gladly trade you my brand new BCD996T for your XTS5000 on any \n
bandsplit.
> Hell, I'll throw in the remote head \n too!!!!!!!!!
>
>
> In a message dated 2/15/2008 1:26:03 \n P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> cowpoke71az@ ... writes:
> \n
>
>
>
> If you are not authorized to be on the \n system, buy a scanner to
monitor it.
> If not they will nuke your \n radio and you will have an expensive
paper weight.
> If on the off \n chance you are authorized to be on that system have
the system
> \n admin program the radio for you. He or she will know how to set it
up for \n you
> and your radio will not become a paper weight.
>
> \n Matthew <ctx54635@centuryte lctx5> wrote:
>
>
> \n Hi All is it possible for the xts5000 to be in recieve only mode,
I'm \n
> thinking about using one to monitor Illinois Starcom 21 system. \n
>
>
>
>
>
>
> \n ____________ _________ _________ ______
> Never miss a \n thing. _Make Yahoo your homepage._
> (http://us.rd. yahoo.com/ evt=51438/ *http://www. yahoo.com/ r/hs) \n
>
>
>
>
>
>
> \n ************ **The year's hottest artists on the red carpet at the \n
Grammy
> Awards. Go to AOL Music.
> (http://music. aol.com/grammys? NCID=aolcmp00300 000002565)
>