{ "numMessagesInTopic": 13, "nextInTime": 1318, "senderId": "FsA0QGvYGUC3Vqtj5DxYPYAQ_jKzozPFZLIEby2d9U-lAziBHux9kLPrCwvheOIa7qTyP1f9w2O0BiLlQKnmQtSfy63_0BrMIQp3f7rZUgM", "systemMessage": true, "subject": "Re: Re-banding Update Latest from the Shack", "from": ""wildcatmo21" <m.oldfather@...>", "authorName": "wildcatmo21", "msgSnippet": "In Wichita, the only thing worth scanning is the Motorola trunking system, all fire,pd, ems etc are on the analog Motorola trunking system. I returned my 97 on", "msgId": 1317, "profile": "wildcatmo21", "topicId": 1262, "spamInfo": { "reason": "12", "isSpam": false }, "replyTo": "LIST", "userId": 189241989, "messageBody": "
> I'm new to this. How widespread are Motorola trunked systems andare
\n
> they worth monitoring? What type communications use Motorolatrunked
\n
> systems?that
\n>
\n>
\n> --- In Pro-97@yahoogroups.com, "Ken R." <kenr55@b...> wrote:
\n> > If you won't be monitoring any Motorola trunked systems, then
\n> rebanding won't be an issue for you. If you do monitor Motorola
\n> trunked systems, you might want to look into a Bearcat BC246T.
\n> >
\n> > Ken
\n> >
\n> >
\n> > ----- Original Message -----
\n> > From: Tom and Maria Walsh
\n> > To: Pro-97@yahoogroups.com
\n> > Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 9:15 AM
\n> > Subject: [Pro-97] Re: Re-banding Update Latest from the Shack
\n> >
\n> >
\n> > I was planning on buying a PRO 97 this week. Does this mean
\n
> IRS
\n> > shouldn't? And if so, what would you recommend?
\n> >
\n> >
\n> >
\n> >
\n> > --- In Pro-97@yahoogroups.com, "bwigg2002" <wa4gki@w...> wrote:
\n> > > --- In Pro-97@yahoogroups.com, "Tom" <thomask112@c...> wrote:
\n> > > > Are you saying that I just bought an obsolete radio from
\n
> andWhat
\n> > > they
\n> > > knew it was obsolete because it could not be rebanded?
\n
> areasup
\n> > > are
\n> > > affected by this Nextel issue? I'm in a very high use
\n> cellular
\n> > area
\n> > > with 4 cell sites within a mile of me. Am I shafted?
\n> > > >
\n> > > > What options do we have for an RS product that can be
\n> rebanded?
\n> > >
\n> > > I wouldn't say you are shafted, but I think RS is not quite
\n
> tois
\n> > > speed on this issue. The rebanding issue is nationwide and
\n
> > supposedend
\n> > > to be comepleted in 36 months. Wave one started around the
\n
> ofwill
\n> > June.
\n> > > If you do not monitor analog trunked motorola systems it
\n
> not--
\n> > have
\n> > > any effect on you. Go to http://www.800ta.org and it will
\n> explain
\n> > the
\n> > > issue. The RS PR0-96 and RS PRO-2096 should be ok with the
\n> > rebanding
\n> > > shakeup.(hopefully)
\n> >
\n> >
\n> >
\n> >
\n> >
\n> >
\n> > SPONSORED LINKS Ham radio Ham radio sales
\n> >
\n> >
\n> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
\n
> -----------Terms
\n> > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
\n> >
\n> > a.. Visit your group "Pro-97" on the web.
\n> >
\n> > b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
\n> > Pro-97-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
\n> >
\n> > c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
\n
> of Service.--
\n> >
\n> >
\n> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
\n
> -----------
\n> >
\n> >
\n> >
\n> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]