{ "numMessagesInTopic": 4, "nextInTime": 1408, "senderId": "FE-pjoEGrsSpEzO3TRXcPuuTdUyXpXvAloWAZl7z90mNr_eSi1-vdMczsp8Afzr8oWXZ12p8rfS1EYy1W0SXwAlSaWVTyzMdWHQs7YUj4Ks", "systemMessage": false, "subject": "Re: New user...", "from": ""kenwantsmoney" <kenwantsmoney@...>", "authorName": "kenwantsmoney", "msgSnippet": "I am in SW Florida and am a firefighter in the city of Cape Coral. We live in Lee county. Currently, I am able to hear Cape FD Main and tac s (Bank 0), Cape PD", "msgId": 1407, "profile": "kenwantsmoney", "topicId": 1403, "spamInfo": { "reason": "12", "isSpam": false }, "replyTo": "LIST", "userId": 227686004, "messageBody": "
--- In Pro-97@yahoogroups.com, tk <qmp@p...> wrote:
\n> First question is: Where are you and what do ya wanna hear?
\n> The rule is that you can only have one system per bank, now
\n> that that is said, I have hear that if you put in the control channels
\n> for each site seperated by a conventional FM freq that the scanner
\n> will look at all the control channels it can hear.
\n> Check out http://www.radioreference.com/ for your system info.
\n>
\n> kenwantsmoney wrote:
\n>
\n> >Hi all. Just bought my Pro-97 this week. This is my first venture
\n> >into scanning.
\n> >
\n> >First off, to someone who is unfamiliar, this thing can be a real
\n> >pain in the posterior to
\n> >program. The manual is vague in quite a few spots and skips around
\n> >way too much.
\n> >
\n> >Otherwise, this thing is cool as hell!
\n> >
\n> >Now a question. I have input every frequency I can find for my area.
\n> >(Trunked, 8 tower
\n> >simulcast, Motorola type II system). I'm hearing most of what I want,
\n> >except for our EMS
\n> >system. All talkgroup numbers are in and correct to the best of my
\n> >knowledge. I've even
\n> >given them their own bank. I hear nothing from EMS on their main
\n> >dispatch or Tac
\n> >channels.
\n> >All public safety agencies in the county are working off the same set
\n> >of frequencies.
\n> >
\n> >Inexperienced as I am with this, I have 2 possible explanations:
\n> >
\n> >1. They are now using a new unpublished frequency set. (Unlikley,
\n> >because I don't hear
\n> >them even while scanning the entire public safety 800 mhz range)
\n> >
\n> >2. They've gone digital.
\n> >
\n> >Any other ideas? They are very busy and should be all over the air.
\n> >
\n> >Thanks. Glad to join the group.
\n> >
\n> >
\n> >
\n> >
\n> >
\n> >
\n> >Yahoo! Groups Links
\n> >
\n> >
\n> >
\n> >
\n> >
\n> >
\n> >
\n> >
\n> >