{ "numMessagesInTopic": 22, "nextInTime": 1444, "senderId": "Huq1kbeQPc4yzoUrLpDT-4qd1buEsCJ0DnNidVssKfHw1CXaxz-6-2YW-FWaCrukB3PX1X0FY-gQOqvX_pQavSX5jcQ", "systemMessage": false, "subject": "Re: [Pro-97] LTR programming", "from": "Clark <c.rennie1@...>", "authorName": "Clark", "msgSnippet": "Then your problem has already been answered. See message #1435 by Matt Roberts. Clark ... [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]", "msgId": 1443, "profile": "cerennie2000", "topicId": 309, "spamInfo": { "reason": "12", "isSpam": false }, "replyTo": "LIST", "userId": 182263658, "messageBody": "
>Clark that's not the problem. Maybe you didn't read my post right. I said[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
\n>I got the system programmed properly. All I need now is to save the
\n>talkgroups to the sub-group lists and alpha-tag them. This is where the
\n>problem starts. When I enter the proper format, X-XX-XXX, it says "invalid
\n>freq". I can hit "T" and save it that way with no problem. But since I
\n>already know the talkgroups I want to tag, I'd like to enter it manually.
\n>And on a side note I tried the tool "LTR Repeater Finder" just as the
\n>instructions said to use it, and it didn't work properly for me.
\n>
\n>
\n>Dale
\n>
\n> ----- Original Message -----
\n> From: Clark
\n> To: Pro-97@yahoogroups.com
\n> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 4:16 PM
\n> Subject: Re: [Pro-97] LTR programming
\n>
\n>
\n> The PRO-97 has a tool called the "LTR Repeater Finder".
\n> See page 25 of the manual.
\n> I have found it to be of assistance and sometimes not completely accurate.
\n> I don't know why, but it does help.
\n>
\n>
\n> Clark
\n>
\n>
\n> At 04:01 AM 9/29/2005, you wrote:
\n>
\n> >Ok I got the LTR system I wanted in my scanner tonight. The only problem
\n> >is, when I enter the talkgroup in X-XX-XXX format it says "invalid" for
\n> >some reason. Does this scanner want it entered another way? If so, then
\n> >how should I enter it? I have already tried all the possible combinations
\n> >I can think of. As far as the system goes, it's tracking great. It is not
\n> >a busy system so I have not heard much on it, but that's normal. So I
\n> know
\n> >I have them all in the correct LCN or I would get nothing. Because at
\n> >first I didn't have them in the right LCN order.
\n> >
\n> >
\n> >Thanks,
\n> >Dale
\n
\n
\n