{ "numMessagesInTopic": 22, "nextInTime": 1448, "senderId": "jdkoM3dxYeqAnGVKQSgoPdvspwrZERBas5s3gqucyQN-zyaiFWkOH5ETy1iT-MoRH3UD__cayGHUMzf2IRBrimicoDs", "systemMessage": false, "subject": "RE: [Pro-97] LTR programming", "from": "Clark <c.rennie1@...>", "authorName": "Clark", "msgSnippet": "Nat l Science and Technology (WPMM274) in Southern Calif. Maybe because it has about seven transmitter sites. Clark ... [Non-text portions of this message have", "msgId": 1447, "profile": "cerennie2000", "topicId": 309, "spamInfo": { "reason": "12", "isSpam": false }, "replyTo": "LIST", "userId": 182263658, "messageBody": "
>When you said the "repeater finder" tool didn't work properly for you, was[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
\n>it giving you the incorrect repeater number or not giving you anything? I
\n>have found it to work very well on MOST systems. There are a few repeaters
\n>in a couple of systems that don't register the repeater number with any
\n>consistency, and from time to time the 97 shows an incorrect repeater
\n>number. Which system were you working with?
\n>
\n>Clayton
\n
\n
\n