{ "numMessagesInTopic": 3, "nextInTime": 212, "senderId": "KSMxAkgfnalllq3k9GqKLYRinHQ6r0r79zkgFYjyYoLY2k9pJYH0xrkzGeKGc3EhV61MUfNa9UQs", "systemMessage": false, "subject": "Re: [Pro-97] 96 or 97?", "from": "tk <qmp@...>", "authorName": "tk", "msgSnippet": "I have had a 97 for a few days now, overall I like it but... It will take awhile to get used to the vol. and squelch control being on the same shaft. It", "msgId": 211, "profile": "wb6qmp", "topicId": 208, "spamInfo": { "reason": "12", "isSpam": false }, "replyTo": "LIST", "userId": 41982705, "messageBody": "
>I like features on both the 97 and the 96. I don't need digital at
\n>the moment but will in about 8 to 12 months when Arkansas State Police
\n>go online with the new digi system.
\n>
\n>I have a 246T so the signal stalker function isn't a concern. I
\n>really like the looks of the 97 and could buy it today. I can only
\n>buy a 96 if I save another $100 to $150.....
\n>
\n>Any suggestions from those who own both as to which one they prefer
\n>and why?....I could always sell the 97 and the 246T later when I need
\n>digital and get the 96 or the new BCD396T? I would just like the
\n>better of the two for now. If it happens to be the 97, I'll deal with
\n>the digital end when I need it.
\n>
\n>Thanks for any replies.
\n>
\n>
\n>
\n>
\n>
\n>
\n>Yahoo! Groups Links
\n>
\n>
\n>
\n>
\n>
\n>
\n>
\n>
\n>
\n>
\n>