{ "numMessagesInTopic": 12, "nextInTime": 2226, "senderId": "Jx-5i3mZ9qYdoG-YpHXtDMm0xwAMNRsu94RmpA1TEgm0dsLkNT8RFHeOgNW069dBlYWsRHQR1pLL", "systemMessage": false, "subject": "Re: [Pro-97] Radio shack Pro-97", "from": "tk <qmp@...>", "authorName": "tk", "msgSnippet": "The one big problem I have is the adjacent channel bleed over. Here in SoCal there tends to be users every 12.5 Khz. and the pro-97 just doesn t have a narrow", "msgId": 2225, "profile": "wb6qmp", "topicId": 2215, "spamInfo": { "reason": "4", "isSpam": false }, "replyTo": "LIST", "userId": 41982705, "messageBody": "
>I love the PRO-97. There's always the possibility of defective[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
\n>equipment when dealing with any product. The PRO-97 just came out, so
\n>don't look for a replacement soon...
\n>
\n>------------------
\n>Matt Roberts
\n>Ohio, USA
\n>Parma, Ohio Live Scanner:
\n>http://livescanner.redirectme.net:8000/listen.m3u
\n>
\n>GMail: Now with 2670 MB of storage. Ask me for an invite!
\n>
\n>On Dec 4, 2005, at 3:53 PM, jsbuck2003 wrote:
\n>
\n>
\n>
\n>>I purchased the this scanner and would get more interference then with
\n>>my old pro-30. I did take it back.
\n>>
\n>>Can not aford the digital handheld.
\n>>
\n>>Question: is the Pro-97 a excellent scanner and could I have gotten a
\n>>bad one. Is radioshack replacing this one with another one.
\n>>
\n>>I am in Des moines, IA
\n>>
\n>>Thanks to all.
\n>>Jim
\n>>
\n>>
\n>
\n>
\n>
\n>
\n>
\n>Yahoo! Groups Links
\n>
\n>
\n>
\n>
\n>
\n>
\n>
\n>
\n>
\n
\n
\n