{ "numMessagesInTopic": 6, "nextInTime": 2295, "senderId": "9IpQeN2H2968xQ2XlvGxRjlQtqqNbkSR7xKW9hlV1HYkgphMe2RuVAZDN4Z3E-VfFgMoge5M0hX0n2g8lXneuJ8Jr6kK5ZgUBaxTvL98Pi7k", "systemMessage": false, "subject": "Re: [Pro-97] Re: Alternative Antenna?", "from": ""Anthony Perzia" <voodoogoon@...>", "authorName": "Anthony Perzia", "msgSnippet": "I use it on the VHF band and have no problem with it. In my opinion it works better then the stock antenna. ... From: Dave To: Pro-97@yahoogroups.com Sent:", "msgId": 2294, "profile": "scannernut01", "topicId": 2287, "spamInfo": { "reason": "4", "isSpam": false }, "replyTo": "LIST", "userId": 229457889, "messageBody": "
----- Original Message -----
\n From: Dave
\n To: Pro-97@yahoogroups.com
\n Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 3:58 PM
\n Subject: [Pro-97] Re: Alternative Antenna?
\n
\n
\n > the RS 800mHz antenna, but does it degrade reception
\n > on the VHF-low and high bands?
\n
\n It doesn't degrade signal on VHF, it stays pretty much the same...
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\n YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
\n
\n a.. Visit your group "Pro-97" on the web.
\n
\n b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
\n Pro-97-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
\n
\n c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
\n
\n
\n------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\n
\n
\n
\n[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]