{ "numMessagesInTopic": 55, "nextInTime": 37, "senderId": "BbF0KBd6eHtxO4CerOakzhXcPsfjErlV4_XALBC9PNSW-Z0HSuN6WSraacbztdm9VJrnd6WRJFkhDBdaZMkwThTWpmZQsyWWSr81c3c9BVVl", "systemMessage": false, "subject": "Re: [Pro-97] Re: Pro-97", "from": "Results Not Typical <qoatzecotl@...>", "authorName": "Results Not Typical", "msgSnippet": "Where did you find this? It doesn t seem very official to me... ... Matt Roberts OH004 ... __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? ", "msgId": 36, "profile": "qoatzecotl", "topicId": 28, "spamInfo": { "reason": "0", "isSpam": false }, "replyTo": "LIST", "userId": 90926920, "messageBody": "
>__________________________________________________
\n> Direct quote from Radio Shack: "This is an state of
\n> the art updated
\n> version replacing the discontinued PRO-92 series.
\n> The features were
\n> so popular that we were bombarded by requests to
\n> make a scanner that
\n> was like the 92's. Voila. the 97. Yes there are
\n> some improvements
\n> as technology has allowed for improved LTR
\n> capability, Signal
\n> Stalking, and a much faster scan/search rate than
\n> the 92's."
\n>
\n>
\n>
\n>
\n>
\n> --- In Pro-97@yahoogroups.com, Matt Roberts
\n> <qoatzecotl1@c...> wrote:
\n> > We've been through this. I explained that it's
\n> more of a PRO-95
\n> > replacement than a handheld PRO-2051...
\n> >
\n> > Some people even thought it was a PRO-92
\n> replacement, but they've
\n> been
\n> > discontinued for a while, now...
\n> >
\n> > ----------------------------
\n> > Matt Roberts OH004
\n> > Ohio, USA
\n> > Parma, Ohio Live Scanner:
\n> >
\n> http://livescanner.redirectme.net:8000/playlist.pls
\n> >
\n> > On Jan 25, 2005, at 9:43 AM, Dave wrote:
\n> >
\n> > >
\n> > >
\n> > > I see this in the Yahoo Group heading info:
\n> "Type acceptance was
\n> > > received under ADV2000527 on 10/28/04 and is
\n> carried under Radio
\n> > > Shack SKU #20-527. It seems this is a portable
\n> version of the
\n> PRO-
\n> > > 2051 base/mobile that recently received type
\n> acceptance".
\n> > >
\n> > > The PRO-97 is "mostly" a GRE design with
\n> exception of the Signal
\n> > > Stalker features mentioned in the FCC
\n> preliminary O/M and is in
\n> the
\n> > > same linage as the PRO-92,3,5,6, but the
\n> PRO-2051 looks to be a
\n> > > Uniden OEM with many of the same features as the
\n> BCT-8 with a
\n> Uniden
\n> > > AMWUB331 FCC id. Unless GRE and Uniden have had
\n> some co-op
\n> > > engineering, such as it looks to be on the
\n> PRO-94B and PRO-83,
\n> with a
\n> > > GREse programming style PC/IF one-way (upload
\n> only) port that
\n> ScanCat
\n> > > has written software (ScanCat Lite) for.
\n> > >
\n> > > The prelim O/M suggests that the Signal Stalker
\n> features are
\n> somewhat
\n> > > different from the Uniden OEM PRO-83 version.
\n> Could it be more
\n> > > related more to Optoelectronics scout in the SS
\n> features? I
\n> guess if
\n> > > you compaired patent numbers perhaps that would
\n> shed some light,
\n> but
\n> > > I don't really think the 97 and 2051 are true
\n> handheld to
\n> base/mobile
\n> > > matched set like a PRO-92/2067, PRO-93/2053, or
\n> even a PRO-
\n> 96/2096.
\n> > >
\n> > >
\n> > > --- In Pro-97@yahoogroups.com, mch <mch@n...>
\n> wrote:
\n> > >> Uhhh... look at the FIRST THREE POSTS in this
\n> group.
\n> Specifically,
\n> > > the
\n> > >> first and third one. It's already been type
\n> accetped by the FCC.
\n> > >
\n> > >
\n> > >
\n> > >
\n> > >
\n> > >
\n> > >
\n> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
\n> > >
\n> > >
\n> > >
\n> > >
\n> > >
\n> > >
\n> > >
\n>
\n>
\n>
\n>
\n
\n
\n