{ "numMessagesInTopic": 5, "nextInTime": 381, "senderId": "2k01sgHGySiKyM98D2_Hen7oW6RxUnMcNKF6EG5tcgAZ_BcqMZ9YxPUYWjz73Pt7k48TMk_wN03ccVo5-6Sx7Ruitpf4", "systemMessage": false, "subject": "Re: [Pro-97] Stalker on Disposables?", "from": ""Bob Savery" <bsavery@...>", "authorName": "Bob Savery", "msgSnippet": "I ve noticed the same thing with my Pro-95... Using Elcheapo Brand alkaline batteries, I can t receive anything from a NSP tower about 15 miles from here.", "msgId": 380, "profile": "bsavery1", "topicId": 377, "spamInfo": { "reason": "12", "isSpam": false }, "replyTo": "LIST", "userId": 179963204, "messageBody": "
----- Original Message -----
\n From: Ted Moran
\n To: Pro-97@yahoogroups.com
\n Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 10:15 AM
\n Subject: [Pro-97] Stalker on Disposables?
\n
\n
\n While Pro-97'ing (verb?) an airshow this weekend I seemed to
\n observe that the stalker function was working very poorly, if at all,
\n while running on disposable batteries. I switched to
\n rechargeables - actually rechargeables in the black disposable
\n battery holder, and in a minute or two had hits on vitrually
\n everything up and running at the show. But with the disposable
\n AA's in the black case, stalker was getting almost nothing.
\n
\n Could a subtle voltage difference between the two pack setups
\n make this much of a difference? Anyone else noticing this?
\n
\n Hmmm... - Ted
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\n Yahoo! Groups Links
\n
\n a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
\n http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Pro-97/
\n
\n b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
\n Pro-97-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
\n
\n c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
\n
\n
\n
\n[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]