{ "numMessagesInTopic": 28, "nextInTime": 539, "senderId": "mbrnBn5bSWdQmU5OHkKhdJ6slGo5YZbbKdrX7RCBA-Y0hREJ95FoNdy_1ajg13E4Rnzdfv6-wgvN", "systemMessage": false, "subject": "Re: [Pro-97] Considering a Pro 97", "from": "tk <qmp@...>", "authorName": "tk", "msgSnippet": "I would stick with the pro-95... The pro-97 has some nice features but I like the 95 better. If you NEED PL/DPL decoding or LTR trunking or have a real need", "msgId": 538, "profile": "wb6qmp", "topicId": 515, "spamInfo": { "reason": "12", "isSpam": false }, "replyTo": "LIST", "userId": 41982705, "messageBody": "
> Friends
\n>I am considering the purchase of a Pro 97 .. I currently own :
\n>
\n>Pro 2052
\n>Pro 2006
\n>
\n>Trident TR 2400 ---- FOR SALE
\n>
\n>Pro 95 Currently my Primary trunk tracking scanner.
\n>
\n>I don't see our community going digital any time soon. It's been only a
\n>couple of years that the move to trunking took place.. So as popular
\n>as digital is it's not here..
\n>
\n>I want to get the Pro 97. .But in order do that i have to make way for
\n>it by selling the Trident TR 2400 which I simply don't use. . If you
\n>wish to offer advice or are interested in the Trident TR 2400. Please e
\n>mail me in private. . THANKS Steve
\n>
\n>
\n>
\n>
\n>
\n>
\n>Yahoo! Groups Links
\n>
\n>
\n>
\n>
\n>
\n>
\n>
\n>
\n>