{ "numMessagesInTopic": 2, "nextInTime": 556, "senderId": "VNzq8ccnn8dxaovMKR8E3JoYZ5Sts_em7yzFUx_6BeNWCr4qE1ZQsdFmCvxSZ7iw0Sx2qibcAA", "systemMessage": false, "subject": "Re: [Pro-97] Alpha Tags", "from": "mch <mch@...>", "authorName": "mch", "msgSnippet": "Well, to save you time reading: YES, it has alpha tags. That said, you could have: A) DLed the user manual in the files section. B) Did a search on alpha", "msgId": 555, "profile": "NCC74656_USS_Voyager", "topicId": 554, "spamInfo": { "reason": "12", "isSpam": false }, "replyTo": "LIST", "userId": 126004, "messageBody": "
>
\n> Hello
\n>
\n> I just joined the group tonight. Sorry I did not feel like going
\n> through over 500 posts to find out if this model has Alpha Tags or
\n> not. It does seem like I read somewhere that it does not. Is this
\n> true? At this time not sure if I will even purchase a Pro 97 but
\n> would
\n> like to find out how everyone likes it. Is the 97 easier to operate
\n> than the Pro 83? They had a pretty decent sale on it in the Shack ad
\n> the other day. I have been pretty blessed as my scanner collection
\n> consists of the 92, 93, 95 and 96. Gave the 94 to my Mom for
\n> Christmas
\n> as they had gone to a trunked system in Jefferson, County Ohio. Have
\n> not compared all of these against each other, but would there be an
\n> advantage in getting the 97? Take care and Happy scanning!!!!!
\n>
\n>
\n> Yahoo! Groups Links
\n>
\n>
\n>
\n>