{ "numMessagesInTopic": 9, "nextInTime": 1297, "senderId": "g4Lob6DkBuewuiYsJZRggXDr-YII7c1nbInRDedFkjXnsa5GlQmalDeGcBCqnYgm3XMUf_a5TIY0ct9jpfgHDB-zz2PrYfpm", "systemMessage": false, "subject": "Re: [HDR2496] FTP transfers", "from": "Dennis Kambury <dennis@...>", "authorName": "Dennis Kambury", "msgSnippet": "... Razz would need to have a dedicated IP address for this to work. If that is the case, then yes, absolutely this would work. It would be very cool, in fact!", "msgId": 1296, "profile": "dkambury", "topicId": 1288, "spamInfo": { "reason": "0", "isSpam": false }, "replyTo": "LIST", "userId": 11255542, "messageBody": "
> I was talking to Razz today and he was thinking that if he set it upRazz would need to have a dedicated IP address for this to work. If that is
\n> right, I should be able to FTP the files straight to his HDR's hard
\n> drive. I think he's probably right. What do you think?
\n
\n
>Yeah, it's so easy to forget just how much we can accomplish now that used
\n>> As for ease of swap, given your cool new out-of-room setup - similar to my
\n>> own - unless there's a Mac-ready removeable bay, I wouldn't bother with it.
\n>> I haven't convinced myself that time saved will justify the time spent
\n>> researching the options and dealing with the extra layers of complexity.
\n>
\n> Yeah, I think you're right. We were talking about that today, too. I was
\n> complaining about the HDR not being easily accessible to the outside
\n> world, but Razz stepped in and asked what's the big deal about a 10-20
\n> minute transfer from California to Virginia? That helped put things in
\n> perspective, and shut me up. Well, you can never shut me up, but it came
\n> close. :-)
\n
\n