{ "numMessagesInTopic": 19, "nextInTime": 755, "senderId": "wBQlASoMutEAYy61gAE1aJEPWQl0FmBSAFLcGATJQ_TrAoSYW3dDCMb31yM9z-l6Ph0h7orfPktIWwBOmf-ZMNXP", "systemMessage": false, "subject": "Re: [HDR2496] Re: Punch timelag-Mike, why Mackie and not Radar?", "from": ""J.P. Edmund" <jpe@...>", "authorName": "J.P. Edmund", "msgSnippet": "Ok, this is my second post, but what lag are you all talking about? I did extensive vocal tracking with punching in and out, and I don¹t remember any lags or", "msgId": 754, "topicId": 748, "spamInfo": { "reason": "0", "isSpam": false }, "replyTo": "LIST", "userId": 0, "messageBody": "
On 5/3/01 6:39 PM, "Mike" <mrivers@...> wrote:
\n
\n> --- In hdr2496@y..., mhungria@i... wrote:
\n>
\n>> Mike, I'll travel this month to NY and talked to a lot of guys there
\n>> who's got the Radar 24. One thing that I've mentioned to them was
\n> this
\n>> punchin' problem with delay, familiar to the HDR 2496. They said the
\n>> Radar has no problem like this at all! So why Mackie's HDR has it
\n>> then?
\n>
\n> I think this is something best answered by Mackie, if they choose to.
\n> I'm sure it has something to do with the basic way in which data is
\n> written to the disk, and I'm a hardware guy.
\n>
\n>
\n>
\n> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
\n> HDR2496-unsubscribe@egroups.com
\n>
\n>
\n>
\n> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
\n>
\n>
\n
\n--
\nJ.P. Edmund