{ "numMessagesInTopic": 6, "nextInTime": 1921, "senderId": "28x6si45srPfcdNVnr8UEHPKdln7v6KP21aDXjEQlVni7GBMfTjUVgQyGKjMjdVKWD9_cataSkWbZveLI59_3wxzr7LFVTdQ2R5ySE_7mzp3RnkS", "systemMessage": false, "subject": "Re: ECC Memory", "from": ""erics_overthere" <motorxtreme@...>", "authorName": "erics_overthere", "msgSnippet": "No. The memory that comes with it isn t. The one I but in is but is running in non-ecc mode (bios setting). ... it ... since ... pull ... the", "msgId": 1920, "profile": "erics_overthere", "topicId": 1874, "spamInfo": { "reason": "0", "isSpam": false }, "replyTo": "LIST", "userId": 163242626, "messageBody": "
--- In magnia_sg20@yahoogroups.com, ashkan <ashkan@t...> wrote:
\n> does it have to be ecc?
\n>
\n> -a
\n>
\n> At 07:01 PM 3/22/2004, you wrote:
\n> >Just for information:
\n> >
\n> >I took out the 128mb non-ecc and plugged in 512mb ecc memory and
\nit
\n> >worked fine. I assume the it's running in non-ecc mode though
\nsince
\n> >I haven't gotten into the bios.
\n> >
\n> >--- In magnia_sg20@yahoogroups.com, "erics_overthere"
\n> ><motorxtreme@s...> wrote:
\n> >> everyone is saying to use non-ecc memory. Is this because of
\n> >> incompatibility between ecc and non ecc memory? I'm going to
\npull
\n> >> out the 128mb non-ecc that came with it and stick in 512mb ecc.
\n> >Will
\n> >> it come right to life? Is there a setting to take advantage of
\nthe
\n> >> ecc? I'll use the 128mb in my desktop pc.
\n> >>
\n> >> Thanks,
\n> >> Eric S.
\n> >
\n> >
\n> >
\n> >
\n> >
\n> >Yahoo! Groups Links
\n> >
\n> >
\n> >
\n> >